- Car Buying
- Car Selling
- Car Ownership
- Car Aftermarket
- On The Move
- Lifestyle
This is an old car model that is no longer for sale by the local distributor since Dec 2012.
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Reviews of Toyota Harrier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- Sort By
-
- results/page
Good compromise between... | Posted on 01 Mar 2011 |
![]() | |
|
![]() |
|
Review
Good compromise between the Rav4 and Lexus RX 350, therefore the consumption is quite high (8.0km/litre but not 11km/lt as mentionned) compare to the Rav 4 that I had previously (3 years).
What I like
Somehow, I am glad to have a Harrier moonroof, that fortunately I bought before the jump of COE...
A lot of place for the legs, silence,
What I do not like
2.400 cc engine lack of power sometimes due to the heavy vehicle.
Gas consumption need improvement.
![](https://i.i-sgcm.com/new_cars/cars/10005/10005_m.jpg)
4
stars - based on 2 reviews
Review
Personally speaking, I love the Toyota Harrier 240G. It is fun to cruise around with, although it is quite underpowered due to the 2.4 engine. The interior is very luxurious, the ride height is good, and it corners very well. I have installed a bigger exhaust pipe, and it seems to have a better acceleration rate compared to the one's with the stock exhaust pipe. It can easily get to 100km/h in 10 seconds, but I find it difficult to accelerate from 120-180km/h (takes about 53 seconds from 0-180). I used to own a 3.0L V6 Harrier, and there isn't much of a difference between the 3.0 and the 2.4, however, the V6 is very thirsty (managed 7.1km/L) unlike the 2.4. Overall its an amazing vehicle with fancy gadgets. Well done to Toyota.
What I like
- The fuel consumption is quite impressive, I manage 12.8km/L
- AFS lights
- TV/DVD and rear back up camera
- Very comfortable seats
- Luxurious looks both inside and out
What I do not like
- 2.4L inline-4 is quite underpowered for the Harrier's weight
- 4-speed automatic only (needs an extra gear)