View page in desktop
|
Report error
  •   Apple app store icon
  • Google play store icon
Terms of Service
|
Privacy Policy
|
PDPA
|
Site Map
|
Whistleblowing Portal
©2004-2026 Sgcarmart, Singapore. All rights reserved.
  • Home
  • Car Articles
  • news
  • news Listings
  • Other News
  • oBike users unlikely to get back deposits as firm undergoes liquidation

    27 Jun 2018

    |

    1,156 views

    With bicycle-sharing operator oBike now in liquidation in Singapore, the chances for users to get a refund of their deposits are slim, say lawyers.


    It is unclear how many people have unreturned deposits - up to $49 - which they placed with oBike to rent its two-wheelers, although some 260 customers have lodged complaints with the consumer watchdog against oBike so far this year.

    oBike decided to cease operations due to difficulties in meeting upcoming Land Transport Authority licensing requirements
    Lawyer Steven Lam, a Director at Templars Law, said when liquidators distribute the assets of a company to pay off its debts, the end users - who are unsecured creditors - are usually last in the pecking order. "It means they may not get back a single cent," Mr. Lam told The Straits Times.

    The Business Times reported that oBike chalked up a loss of more than $4 million last year (2017), and owes unpaid fees to various service providers, including an unnamed logistics firm and a public relations agency, Ruder Finn.

    When asked about oBike's financials, a source close to the company referred ST to the as yet to be named liquidators. The source, which requested anonymity, would only say, "The local (Singapore) team will do the best to refund users but it will hugely depend on the liquidator."

    Farallon Law Corporation's Managing Director Nicolas Tang said none of oBike's customers would be able to sue for the return of deposits during the liquidation process, when any legal action against oBike is not allowed under the Companies Act. "This is to prevent any further deterioration of oBike's financial position," Mr. Tang said.


    Concerns have also been raised about the personal data collected by oBike, which had one million users
    Noting that oBike users have limited recourse at this stage, Mr. Tang said they could consider pooling resources to engage a law firm to represent them as a class of users in the liquidation proceedings.

    However, this would be time consuming and long drawn, and "it is likely that their legal costs would be higher than their deposits", Mr. Tang added. News of oBike's liquidation came a day after it made an unexpected announcement on Monday (25th June) that it was ceasing operations in Singapore.

    The reason it gave was that it foresaw difficulties in meeting upcoming Land Transport Authority licensing requirements.

    The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) said on Tuesday (26th June) most of the complaints it has received were lodged within the past two days, mainly about the non-return of deposits that were asked for months ago. Concerns have also been raised about the personal data collected by oBike, which previously claimed that it had one million users.

    Tech lawyer Bryan Tan of Pinsent Masons MPillay said, "Under the Personal Data Protection Act, if a company has collected data and the purpose for which it is being used comes to an end, the firm is required to delete it. The officers of the company are also personally responsible for that compliance."

    Chinese-owned oBike, which rolled out in Singapore in January last year (2017), had an office in Commonwealth Lane, and at least 20 staff. ST understands that no oBike employees have lodged any salary-related claims with the Ministry of Manpower.
    24.4k

    Tags

    obike obike cease operation obike liquidation bike sharing bicycle sharing

    AllReviewsNewsAdviceFeaturesVideos
    • Home
    • Car Articles
    • news
    • news Listings
    • Other News

    oBike users unlikely to get back deposits as firm undergoes liquidation

    27 Jun 2018

    |

    1,156 views

    With bicycle-sharing operator oBike now in liquidation in Singapore, the chances for users to get a refund of their deposits are slim, say lawyers.


    It is unclear how many people have unreturned deposits - up to $49 - which they placed with oBike to rent its two-wheelers, although some 260 customers have lodged complaints with the consumer watchdog against oBike so far this year.

    oBike decided to cease operations due to difficulties in meeting upcoming Land Transport Authority licensing requirements
    Lawyer Steven Lam, a Director at Templars Law, said when liquidators distribute the assets of a company to pay off its debts, the end users - who are unsecured creditors - are usually last in the pecking order. "It means they may not get back a single cent," Mr. Lam told The Straits Times.

    The Business Times reported that oBike chalked up a loss of more than $4 million last year (2017), and owes unpaid fees to various service providers, including an unnamed logistics firm and a public relations agency, Ruder Finn.

    When asked about oBike's financials, a source close to the company referred ST to the as yet to be named liquidators. The source, which requested anonymity, would only say, "The local (Singapore) team will do the best to refund users but it will hugely depend on the liquidator."

    Farallon Law Corporation's Managing Director Nicolas Tang said none of oBike's customers would be able to sue for the return of deposits during the liquidation process, when any legal action against oBike is not allowed under the Companies Act. "This is to prevent any further deterioration of oBike's financial position," Mr. Tang said.


    Concerns have also been raised about the personal data collected by oBike, which had one million users
    Noting that oBike users have limited recourse at this stage, Mr. Tang said they could consider pooling resources to engage a law firm to represent them as a class of users in the liquidation proceedings.

    However, this would be time consuming and long drawn, and "it is likely that their legal costs would be higher than their deposits", Mr. Tang added. News of oBike's liquidation came a day after it made an unexpected announcement on Monday (25th June) that it was ceasing operations in Singapore.

    The reason it gave was that it foresaw difficulties in meeting upcoming Land Transport Authority licensing requirements.

    The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) said on Tuesday (26th June) most of the complaints it has received were lodged within the past two days, mainly about the non-return of deposits that were asked for months ago. Concerns have also been raised about the personal data collected by oBike, which previously claimed that it had one million users.

    Tech lawyer Bryan Tan of Pinsent Masons MPillay said, "Under the Personal Data Protection Act, if a company has collected data and the purpose for which it is being used comes to an end, the firm is required to delete it. The officers of the company are also personally responsible for that compliance."

    Chinese-owned oBike, which rolled out in Singapore in January last year (2017), had an office in Commonwealth Lane, and at least 20 staff. ST understands that no oBike employees have lodged any salary-related claims with the Ministry of Manpower.
    24.4k

    Tags

    obike obike cease operation obike liquidation bike sharing bicycle sharing

    Newsletter

    Be Notified On The Latest News

    Newsletter

    Be Notified On The Latest News

    Latest COE Prices

    November 2026 | 1st BIDDING
    NEXT TENDER: 18 Nov 2026
    CAT A
    $139,001
    CAT B
    $132,334
    CAT C
    $92,000
    CAT E
    $135,998
    View Full Results

    Latest COE Prices

    November 2026 | 1st BIDDING
    NEXT TENDER: 18 Nov 2026
    CAT A
    $139,001
    CAT B
    $132,334
    CAT C
    $92,000
    CAT E
    $135,998
    View Full Results

    Related Articles

    BMW 3 Series M350 xDrive First Drive Review

    BMW 3 Series M350 xDrive First Drive Review

    Mercedes-Benz Singapore gives the GLB a full hybrid variant

    Mercedes-Benz Singapore gives the GLB a full hybrid variant

    BYD Atto 3 Evo Facelift Review

    BYD Atto 3 Evo Facelift Review

    Maxus MIFA 7 Elite Review

    Maxus MIFA 7 Elite Review

    The BYD Sealion 8 seven-seater SUV arrives in Singapore

    The BYD Sealion 8 seven-seater SUV arrives in Singapore

    Cars of 2026

    Cars of 2026

    Tesla Model 3 Facelift Review

    Tesla Model 3 Facelift Review

    Lexus ES350h Hybrid Review

    Lexus ES350h Hybrid Review

    Related Articles

    BMW 3 Series M350 xDrive First Drive Review

    BMW 3 Series M350 xDrive First Drive Review

    Mercedes-Benz Singapore gives the GLB a full hybrid variant

    Mercedes-Benz Singapore gives the GLB a full hybrid variant

    BYD Atto 3 Evo Facelift Review

    BYD Atto 3 Evo Facelift Review

    Maxus MIFA 7 Elite Review

    Maxus MIFA 7 Elite Review

    The BYD Sealion 8 seven-seater SUV arrives in Singapore

    The BYD Sealion 8 seven-seater SUV arrives in Singapore

    Cars of 2026

    Cars of 2026

    Tesla Model 3 Facelift Review

    Tesla Model 3 Facelift Review

    Lexus ES350h Hybrid Review

    Lexus ES350h Hybrid Review

    You May Also Like

    Sgcarmart Explores: Bras Basah!

    Sgcarmart Explores: Bras Basah!

    New cars are safer: Opt for one when you can

    New cars are safer: Opt for one when you can

    Leapmotor B10: The electric SUV focused on what matters

    Leapmotor B10: The electric SUV focused on what matters

    Tesla Model 3 Facelift Review

    Tesla Model 3 Facelift Review

    The rise of PHEVs: A closer look at the numbers

    The rise of PHEVs: A closer look at the numbers

    The all new XPENG Mona L03 is one smart coupe SUV

    The all new XPENG Mona L03 is one smart coupe SUV

    Cars of 2026

    Cars of 2026

    Sgcarmart Explores: East Coast Park!

    Sgcarmart Explores: East Coast Park!

    Kia Niro Hybrid Facelift Review

    Kia Niro Hybrid Facelift Review

    Multi-Pathway approach: Toyota was always right

    Multi-Pathway approach: Toyota was always right

    Lexus ES350h Hybrid Review

    Lexus ES350h Hybrid Review

    Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric Review

    Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric Review

    The 5 main things you must know about the XPENG L03

    The 5 main things you must know about the XPENG L03

    Don't get yourself trapped in your high-tech EV

    Don't get yourself trapped in your high-tech EV

    Hongqi Singapore opens its showroom doors

    Hongqi Singapore opens its showroom doors

    BYD Atto 3 Evo Facelift Review

    BYD Atto 3 Evo Facelift Review

    You May Also Like

    Sgcarmart Explores: Bras Basah!

    Sgcarmart Explores: Bras Basah!

    New cars are safer: Opt for one when you can

    New cars are safer: Opt for one when you can

    Leapmotor B10: The electric SUV focused on what matters

    Leapmotor B10: The electric SUV focused on what matters

    Tesla Model 3 Facelift Review

    Tesla Model 3 Facelift Review

    The rise of PHEVs: A closer look at the numbers

    The rise of PHEVs: A closer look at the numbers

    The all new XPENG Mona L03 is one smart coupe SUV

    The all new XPENG Mona L03 is one smart coupe SUV

    Cars of 2026

    Cars of 2026

    Sgcarmart Explores: East Coast Park!

    Sgcarmart Explores: East Coast Park!

    Kia Niro Hybrid Facelift Review

    Kia Niro Hybrid Facelift Review

    Multi-Pathway approach: Toyota was always right

    Multi-Pathway approach: Toyota was always right

    Lexus ES350h Hybrid Review

    Lexus ES350h Hybrid Review

    Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric Review

    Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric Review

    The 5 main things you must know about the XPENG L03

    The 5 main things you must know about the XPENG L03

    Don't get yourself trapped in your high-tech EV

    Don't get yourself trapped in your high-tech EV

    Hongqi Singapore opens its showroom doors

    Hongqi Singapore opens its showroom doors

    BYD Atto 3 Evo Facelift Review

    BYD Atto 3 Evo Facelift Review