The importance of wearing a seat belt
23 Dec 2014|19,638 views
In 1993, the Road Traffic Act made buckling-up mandatory for backseat passengers at least 1.5 metres in height. Anyone in the rear caught not wearing a seat belt was slapped with a $120 fine, while the vehicle's driver would be fined the same amount and given three demerit points.
Despite these penalties, many people flouted the rule (and still do, to this day). The excuses given by recalcitrant passengers range from "the belts are uncomfortable" to "the back seat is safer anyway". Others even proclaimed that they had a 'safe driver', and believed they would never get into an accident.
This attitude echoes the initial resistance by local motorists to the wearing of front seat belts, which became compulsory in 1981. Many, including driving instructors, argued that seat belts
would hinder their chances of escaping an automobile in a serious collision, especially if their hands were injured.
Although the rear seat belt law was intended to enhance safety, it wasn't all-encompassing. While every new car registered on or after 1st January 1993 had to have rear seat belts, owners of older cars weren't required to retrofit their vehicles
with extra seat belts.
Even though seat belts have long been proven to save lives in a car crash, they remain unpopular among rear passengers. During a one-week crackdown in 2002, for instance, the Traffic Police issued no less than 587 warnings to rear seat occupants who did not belt up.
Despite these penalties, many people flouted the rule (and still do, to this day). The excuses given by recalcitrant passengers range from "the belts are uncomfortable" to "the back seat is safer anyway". Others even proclaimed that they had a 'safe driver', and believed they would never get into an accident.
This attitude echoes the initial resistance by local motorists to the wearing of front seat belts, which became compulsory in 1981. Many, including driving instructors, argued that seat belts
would hinder their chances of escaping an automobile in a serious collision, especially if their hands were injured.
Although the rear seat belt law was intended to enhance safety, it wasn't all-encompassing. While every new car registered on or after 1st January 1993 had to have rear seat belts, owners of older cars weren't required to retrofit their vehicles
with extra seat belts.
Even though seat belts have long been proven to save lives in a car crash, they remain unpopular among rear passengers. During a one-week crackdown in 2002, for instance, the Traffic Police issued no less than 587 warnings to rear seat occupants who did not belt up.
The Government stepped up its efforts to improve passenger safety seven years later, when all purpose-built MPVs (multi-purpose vehicles) had to have seat belts for each of the back seats.
Specifically, every outboard seat in every rear row has to have a three-point belt, while the middle seats should be
equipped with a lap belt at the very least.
The authorities were very serious about this new ruling, even if it did come into effect on 1st April 2009 (April Fool's Day). The real fools, however, are the backseat passengers who persist in not belting up.
In the event of (touch wood) a bad traffic accident, they could end up being transported in the back of a vehicle exempt from Singapore's rear seat belt law - a hearse.
Here are some related articles that might interest you
Driving in the wet is no rocket science, here's how you can stay safe
Don't get caught without proper car insurance coverage
Five common car insurance claims to avoid
Six crucial components to consider before buying a used car
Specifically, every outboard seat in every rear row has to have a three-point belt, while the middle seats should be
equipped with a lap belt at the very least.
The authorities were very serious about this new ruling, even if it did come into effect on 1st April 2009 (April Fool's Day). The real fools, however, are the backseat passengers who persist in not belting up.
In the event of (touch wood) a bad traffic accident, they could end up being transported in the back of a vehicle exempt from Singapore's rear seat belt law - a hearse.
Here are some related articles that might interest you
Driving in the wet is no rocket science, here's how you can stay safe
Don't get caught without proper car insurance coverage
Five common car insurance claims to avoid
Six crucial components to consider before buying a used car
Got into an accident? Here's how to ensure a smooth insurance claim process
Sgcarmart
Get up to 20% off and $300 cashback when you renew with select car insurance!
Compare car insurance effortlessly with Sgcarmart. Get exclusive offers, discounts and cashback when renewing car insurance with our partner.
- Auto comparison for your future renewal quotes
- We provide claims support for your accident claims
In 1993, the Road Traffic Act made buckling-up mandatory for backseat passengers at least 1.5 metres in height. Anyone in the rear caught not wearing a seat belt was slapped with a $120 fine, while the vehicle's driver would be fined the same amount and given three demerit points.
Despite these penalties, many people flouted the rule (and still do, to this day). The excuses given by recalcitrant passengers range from "the belts are uncomfortable" to "the back seat is safer anyway". Others even proclaimed that they had a 'safe driver', and believed they would never get into an accident.
This attitude echoes the initial resistance by local motorists to the wearing of front seat belts, which became compulsory in 1981. Many, including driving instructors, argued that seat belts
would hinder their chances of escaping an automobile in a serious collision, especially if their hands were injured.
Although the rear seat belt law was intended to enhance safety, it wasn't all-encompassing. While every new car registered on or after 1st January 1993 had to have rear seat belts, owners of older cars weren't required to retrofit their vehicles
with extra seat belts.
Even though seat belts have long been proven to save lives in a car crash, they remain unpopular among rear passengers. During a one-week crackdown in 2002, for instance, the Traffic Police issued no less than 587 warnings to rear seat occupants who did not belt up.
Despite these penalties, many people flouted the rule (and still do, to this day). The excuses given by recalcitrant passengers range from "the belts are uncomfortable" to "the back seat is safer anyway". Others even proclaimed that they had a 'safe driver', and believed they would never get into an accident.
This attitude echoes the initial resistance by local motorists to the wearing of front seat belts, which became compulsory in 1981. Many, including driving instructors, argued that seat belts
would hinder their chances of escaping an automobile in a serious collision, especially if their hands were injured.
Although the rear seat belt law was intended to enhance safety, it wasn't all-encompassing. While every new car registered on or after 1st January 1993 had to have rear seat belts, owners of older cars weren't required to retrofit their vehicles
with extra seat belts.
Even though seat belts have long been proven to save lives in a car crash, they remain unpopular among rear passengers. During a one-week crackdown in 2002, for instance, the Traffic Police issued no less than 587 warnings to rear seat occupants who did not belt up.
The Government stepped up its efforts to improve passenger safety seven years later, when all purpose-built MPVs (multi-purpose vehicles) had to have seat belts for each of the back seats.
Specifically, every outboard seat in every rear row has to have a three-point belt, while the middle seats should be
equipped with a lap belt at the very least.
The authorities were very serious about this new ruling, even if it did come into effect on 1st April 2009 (April Fool's Day). The real fools, however, are the backseat passengers who persist in not belting up.
In the event of (touch wood) a bad traffic accident, they could end up being transported in the back of a vehicle exempt from Singapore's rear seat belt law - a hearse.
Here are some related articles that might interest you
Driving in the wet is no rocket science, here's how you can stay safe
Don't get caught without proper car insurance coverage
Five common car insurance claims to avoid
Six crucial components to consider before buying a used car
Specifically, every outboard seat in every rear row has to have a three-point belt, while the middle seats should be
equipped with a lap belt at the very least.
The authorities were very serious about this new ruling, even if it did come into effect on 1st April 2009 (April Fool's Day). The real fools, however, are the backseat passengers who persist in not belting up.
In the event of (touch wood) a bad traffic accident, they could end up being transported in the back of a vehicle exempt from Singapore's rear seat belt law - a hearse.
Here are some related articles that might interest you
Driving in the wet is no rocket science, here's how you can stay safe
Don't get caught without proper car insurance coverage
Five common car insurance claims to avoid
Six crucial components to consider before buying a used car
Got into an accident? Here's how to ensure a smooth insurance claim process
Sgcarmart
Get up to 20% off and $300 cashback when you renew with select car insurance!
Compare car insurance effortlessly with Sgcarmart. Get exclusive offers, discounts and cashback when renewing car insurance with our partner.
- Auto comparison for your future renewal quotes
- We provide claims support for your accident claims
Â
All Advice Categories
Â