Definition of 'animals' in Road Traffic Act to be reviewed

The Road Traffic Act, enacted in 1963, defines an animal as any horse, cattle, ass, mule, sheep, pig, goat or dog. It requires motorists to stop and help these animals if they knock them down. But should a motorist knock down other creatures, such as cats or wild boar, an offence would not be committed under this law. This quaint definition will be reviewed, reported The Straits Times. 

Meanwhile, drivers who fail to stop and help an animal can be fined up to $3,000 or jailed up to a year, with repeat offenders fined up to $5,000 or jailed up to two years.

Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Lee told Parliament, "The Ministry of Home Affairs intends to review the definition of 'animals' in the Road Traffic Act, and also consider any amendment in the context of road safety, especially the safety of the motorist and other road users." He noted that the specific provision in the Road Traffic Act relating to animals had been confined to farm animals of commercial value.

Mr. Louis Ng (Nee Soon GRC) had asked if the ministry would consider updating and aligning the definition of 'animals' in the Road Traffic Act with that in the Animals and Birds Act - a move animal welfare groups have sought. Mr. Lee noted, however, that both laws have different objectives. The Animals and Birds Act aims to prevent the introduction and spread of diseases through animals, control the movement of animals, prevent cruelty to animals and safeguard the general welfare of animals in Singapore. The Road Traffic Act, on the other hand, seeks to protect the safety of road users, including motorists, cyclists and pedestrians.