Guest, 
 |
 |
In its first bid at a hybrid vehicle, Kia has produced a car that offers up an intriguing blend of two worlds. The Niro sits at the bottom of Kia's current SUV range, and as a crossover, it's good by most standards. As with most of Kia's latest offerings, you also get a wealth of features and equipment usually reserved for cars a class above. More importantly, the Niro delivers fuel economy returns of 19.4km/L, which is mighty impressive for any SUV.
 |
 |
 |
 |
-
6 months driving the Niro EX and it's the best value for money CUV (compact utility vehicle) in it's class. I have a 2 year old and occasionally seat 4 pax. IMO hybrids are the way to go until Ah gong figures out how to price EVs properly and upgrade infrastructure. You can also easily drive across the causeway without range anxiety (SG to KL round trip in 1 tank!)» Read More
Don't throw your money away on petrol variants when they keep raising prices..!
What I like:
+ FC of 24-26km/l (I have squeezed 30km/l, it is possible). Full tank 950-1000km, drive at 70-80km/h
+ slightly raised but not too high, so it doesn't bounce too much like other SUVs
+ spacious interior and ample boot
+ super solid doors that open real wide to fit your car seats
+ at 103k it is crazy value for a reliable hybrid. 10 yr warranty, insane FC which pays for itself
+ fuss free experience with Kia sales folks
What I don't like:
- Seats can be a bit grabby
- no keyless entry, no start stop
- no electric seats (but do you really adjust your seat that much?)
- SX is a full 17k more (back then).. All for LED headlights, keyless entry, roof rails, ventilated seats, wireless charging.. What?! -
My wife and I were looking for a car and we had two main criteria: 1) I wanted a hybrid (possible better resale value in the future with the direction Singapore is going), and 2) wife wanted an SUV (preference in looks/easier to drive). The two criteria meant that our two main contenders came down to the kicks and the niro. What swung us towards the niro were:» Read More
1. Superior build quality (satisfying thump when you close the door VS the light plasticky feel of Nissan's doors)
2. Greater perceived reliability from many car reliability rankings (for Kia in general)
3. Larger rear space (important for the kids)
4. Rear AC (also for the kids)
5. More luxurious interior- looks much more refined as opposed to the kicks cheaper looking interior
6. Better FC
7. Proper rear view camera
8. Looks- we'd set eyes on the niro a year ago and really liked it
What we preferred for the Kicks:
1. The drive
2. More safety features
With all these factors in mind, we decided to go for the niro as we felt it had more going for it :)
I've also just done my first servicing with KIA- good and quick service, no complaints! -
I'm looking for a replacement car that sits higher and with hybrid tech due to my long-distance daily commute.» Read More
Initially was looking at Vezel hybrid but got put off due to being a PI unit. Warranty is going to be a big issue down the road.
The new Toyota Yaris Cross hybrid is too small for my family of 4 and with very basic accessories.
That's when i came across KIA NIRO. Did a test drive and place an order on the same day.
It offers everything that i look for and with an affordable pricing + 10yrs hybrid battery warranty -
We were on the lookout for a family car with good fuel economy at around the $100k mark. Shortlisted the Kia Niro Hybrid, Renault Scenic Diesel, Nissan Kicks, and the Toyota Sienta Hybrid.» Read More
The Kicks then was probably the closest rival, and we almost put down a deposit (dealer was giving a free upgrade to the highest trim level). But once we found out about the Niro (particularly the cheaper EX trim), we were sold. For one, it was a conventional hybrid, with both engine and electric motor driving the wheels depending on situation. Maintainence wise, I would assume that it will be easier to find support if we choose to service our car outside, as the system is similar to those employed by the Toyota Prius and Hyundai Ioniq taxis we have in Singapore - vs the Nissan ePower hybrid system, which seems to be a Nissan-only hybrid system at the moment. In fact, the Niro uses the same engine, gearbox and hybrid system as the Ioniq, and seeing that it is being used as a major taxi model gave us reassurance. Also, it seems the conventional hybrid system is more efficient, with the Niro achieving more KM/litre vs the Kicks. Secondly, space wise, the Niro is bigger than the Kicks in every way. Passenger and driver comfort is better as a result of a wider body and longer wheelbase. Lastly, the interior quality just feels much more upmarket. You get factory fitted Android Auto, Apple Carplay, Reverse camera, Dual Zone AC, and rear centre armrest.
Overall, the Niro is a solid, high quality car with potential low running costs. At under $100k for the EX trim, it is also the cheapest in our shortlist, making it the value hero, and our pick of the lot. -
I bought the new Niro EX facelifted 2020 model in Oct 2020. So far, the car has met and in some aspects, exceeded my expectations. Firstly, the fuel consumption is really good, i pump petrol in every 3 or 4 wks, at around 21-22L/km. The hybrid drivetrain is quite smooth and you do have an option of the DCT sports gear if you need.» Read More
The new 8.0" Entertainment screen is also android/apple pay enabled and looks very nice. The backrow seats are surprising spacious as it can fit my kid's car seat and 2 adults well. The boot is around adequate at 420L for family needs. The exterior of the car also looks quite stylish with the refreshed spoilers and look.
I've been driving this car for 3 to 4months and it is really positive so far. Great A to B for family and fuel efficient. My experience for the buying process at C&C as well as servicing is also good, no complaints. -
Having bought the vehicle in Jul 17, this car has simply outperformed my expectations. Had looked around for a sporty and economical SUV/MPV, and was choosing between the Citroen C4 Picasso and the Niro. What made me swing towards the Niro is its cheaper and has more features that many other models at the same price point does not offer.» Read More
And the sweetener when driving this car is the FC! Sure i can achieve 26km/l and more if drive most of the time on 60km/h, but real world driving comes to abt 20-23km/l depending on your foot. In ECO-mode, the take off is slightly sluggish, but when it cruises, its a very comfortable drive, easy to overtake if you need that bit more push. In Sports-mode, its really rev ready, has alot of torque to really propel you forward from the get go.
Overall, i am very satisfied owner of this vehicle, having driven it for 3 months and its still surprising me with its performance. -
One of the better looking hybrids out on the market now, the Niro packs a ton of features into a relatively affordable package imo.» Read More
As expected from a hybrid, fuel economy is amazing and it should be cheap to run long term. You get better figures in eco mode but that's pretty dull tbh. In sport mode, this thing really punches above its weight but it gets pretty loud.
This car also comes with quite a number of features, my favourite being ventilated seats. I hate getting a sweaty butt while driving. -
Hi,» Read More
The Niro, I think is an excellent car in Singapore's driving conditions. Test drove an enjoyed it. Obviously, Cycle and Carriage has considered the cost and brought in a car with a lot of good stuff. But, the most disappointing item as a lot of you has mentioned is the 5 inch head unit which does not come with navigation. I think no other car in Singapore comes with 5 inch TFT screen. I supposed one of the reason for the small screen, is it does not intent to bring the Niro in with GPS and navigation.
But, one of the key features of the NIro which allows it to save fuel, is Predictive Energy control.
"Predictive Energy Control uses the navigation and cruise-control systems “To anticipate topographical changes on the road ahead and actively manage energy flow,” As well as determine when conditions are optimal to recharge the battery and when it’S better to apply stored energy toward the wheels."
I know Singapore has not much terrain but without navigation, the Niro is lacking a key feature of the car. And of course the disappointing 5 inch screen.
In the UK, US and Europe, the minimum screen size is 7 inches and even in the basic car it has navigation to allow the Predictive Energy Control feature to be utilised.
Just my thought and feedback for Cycle and Carriage. Anyway, I have ordered a Niro.
Thanks, Cheers
Where the Kia Niro stands out in against the Hyundai Ioniq in this year's Car of the Year competition is its honesty to be a hybrid crossover. It does this job well by returning a fuel consumption of 19.4km/L during our time with it. And we drove it with a relatively heavy and hard right foot. In short, for the company's first go at making a hybrid, we must say that the Niro is pretty commendable.
Of course, it has its flaws, but it doesn't lie about them. That's the beauty about the Niro. More relevantly, it sports a wealth of standard equipment, like the heated steering wheel and ventilated front seats, the latter being the highly important feature in a hot climatic country like Singapore.
On the move, the Niro doesn't disappoint. The driving position is nice and high, offering good visibility. This, while many will argue to be insignificant, is an important characteristic that will make shorter drivers more confident on the roads, especially when manoeuvring around narrow alleys or tight spaces.
On the wide open roads, this Kia here is a cinch to pilot. The 1.6-litre 'Kappa' GDI engine (producing 104bhp and 147Nm of torque) combines with a 1.56kWh lithium-polymer battery pack and a 32kW electric motor to produce a total output of 139bhp and 265Nm of torque.
While these figures are easily comparable to the Ioniq, the icing on the cake is the fact that the Niro is more affordable than the Hyundai. In a way, the Niro manages to tick all the necessary boxes when it comes to satisfying customers' needs. You get the practicality and space of a crossover, combined with the fuel efficiency of a hybrid. Once you throw in the extremely keen price of the Niro, there is no doubting its appeal.
Of course, it has its flaws, but it doesn't lie about them. That's the beauty about the Niro. More relevantly, it sports a wealth of standard equipment, like the heated steering wheel and ventilated front seats, the latter being the highly important feature in a hot climatic country like Singapore.
On the move, the Niro doesn't disappoint. The driving position is nice and high, offering good visibility. This, while many will argue to be insignificant, is an important characteristic that will make shorter drivers more confident on the roads, especially when manoeuvring around narrow alleys or tight spaces.
On the wide open roads, this Kia here is a cinch to pilot. The 1.6-litre 'Kappa' GDI engine (producing 104bhp and 147Nm of torque) combines with a 1.56kWh lithium-polymer battery pack and a 32kW electric motor to produce a total output of 139bhp and 265Nm of torque.
While these figures are easily comparable to the Ioniq, the icing on the cake is the fact that the Niro is more affordable than the Hyundai. In a way, the Niro manages to tick all the necessary boxes when it comes to satisfying customers' needs. You get the practicality and space of a crossover, combined with the fuel efficiency of a hybrid. Once you throw in the extremely keen price of the Niro, there is no doubting its appeal.
